saturninefilms:

Son House - Death Letter Blues

“Looked like there was 10,000 people standin’ round the buryin’ ground
I didn’t know I loved her ‘til they laid her down
Looked like 10,000 were standin’ ‘round the buryin’ ground
You know I didn’t know I loved her ‘til they began to let her down

You know I just feel so bad ‘til the good ol’ sun went down
I didn’t have a soul to throw my arms around
Lord, I feel so bad ‘til the good ol’ sun went down
I didn’t have a soul to throw my arms around”

realcleverscience:

the-future-now:

Every month in 2016 has broken a temperature record

For the first time ever, NASA created a mid-year climate report — because this year is so goddamn out-of-control hot. Every month so far this year has broken a temperature record, according to the report. Taken together, the first six months are also the warmest six months on record, with average temperatures about 1.3 Celsius above late-19th-century temperatures. And NASA says El Niño isn’t solely to blame.

Follow @the-future-now

And yet we still have politicians denying climate change is even happening! smh

(Source: mic.com, via sagansense)

realcleverscience:

the-future-now:

Every month in 2016 has broken a temperature record

For the first time ever, NASA created a mid-year climate report — because this year is so goddamn out-of-control hot. Every month so far this year has broken a temperature record, according to the report. Taken together, the first six months are also the warmest six months on record, with average temperatures about 1.3 Celsius above late-19th-century temperatures. And NASA says El Niño isn’t solely to blame.

Follow @the-future-now

And yet we still have politicians denying climate change is even happening! smh

(Source: mic.com, via sagansense)

journalofscience:

image

^ “Through Alpha decay, Uranium-238 decomposes into Thorium-234; a helium nucleus is discharged”. 

When placed inside a cloud chamber, the trails of helium particles being ejected are observable. Furthermore, aren’t Nuclear equations such a clean, efficient language? Its nice.

sci-universe:
“Happy 74th birthday to Stephen Hawking!Not a year has gone past when Stephen Hawking’s achievements, both in terms of science and popular culture, have not made global headlines.
His work has revolutionized theoretical physicis and...

sci-universe:

Happy 74th birthday to Stephen Hawking!

Not a year has gone past when Stephen Hawking’s achievements, both in terms of science and popular culture, have not made global headlines.
His work has revolutionized theoretical physicis and cosmology, made him the Commander of the Order of the British Empire and earned the U.S. Presidential Medal of Freedom, all while his body suffers from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). 

Here are some of his great thoughts and moments:

image

“Some people would claim that things like love, joy and beauty belong to a different category from science and can’t be described in scientific terms, but I think they can now be explained by the theory of evolution.”

image

“The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”

image

“We are in danger of destroying ourselves by our greed and stupidity. We cannot remain looking inwards at ourselves on a small and increasingly polluted and overcrowded planet.”

image

“It is a waste of time to be angry about my disability. One has to get on with life and I haven’t done badly. People won’t have time for you if you are always angry or complaining.”

image

“I have lived with the prospect of an early death for the last 49 years. I’m not afraid of death, but I’m in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first.”

(Source: sci-universe, via sagansense)

"

There is a tradeoff between +∞ and negative numbers.

If one wants to keep many useful laws of algebra then one can use infinity, xor negative numbers, but it is difficult to have both at the same time.

Once one adopts the convention +∞ · 0 = 0 · +∞ = 0, then multiplication becomes upward continuous (i.e.: when both multiplicands increase, the product is what you would expect) but not downward continuous—so 1÷n → 0 works but 1÷n · +∞ ↛ 0 · +∞ fails.

This asymmetry ultimately forces us to define integration from below rather than from above, which leads to still other asymmetries, and finally to two versions of measure and integration theory.

"
-

Terence Tao, Intro to Measure Theory

(I edited the text liberally without … or [])

(Source: terrytao.files.wordpress.com, via isomorphismes)

endeavorist:
“ Are We Getting a Peek at Peak CO2 Emission? Our planet is heating up. The cause is in some ways simple: Humans add a lot of carbon dioxide to the air every year, about 40 billion tons of it. CO2 is a greenhouse gas: It lets sunlight...

endeavorist:

Are We Getting a Peek at Peak CO2 Emission?

Our planet is heating up. The cause is in some ways simple: Humans add a lot of carbon dioxide to the air every year, about 40 billion tons of it. CO2 is a greenhouse gas: It lets sunlight through to heat the ground, but the infrared light the ground emits gets absorbed, and cannot escape to space. That warms us up, slowly but inevitably. By every measure available to us, we see the effects of this increased heat.

But there’s hope, at least a hint of it. A new study has some hopeful news about global warming: The global emission of carbon dioxide slowed substantially in 2014, and is projected to drop a little bit in 2015. This comes after over a decade of quite sharp growth in emission.

Better yet: This happened while the global economy underwent “robust growth”, and it happened in part due to switching to renewables (solar and wind power) as well as a drop in coal use.

Globally, over the past 15 years, we’ve been dumping roughly an extra billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year, jumping from 25 billion tons per year to over 37. But the rate has slowed in the past couple of years; in 2014 the growth slowed dramatically, and according to the new research the rate is projected to drop in 2015 by roughly 0.6 percent, from 35.9 billion tons to 35.7*.

image

That’s not a huge drop, but the point is that it dropped at all (note that there was a drop in 2009 as well, but this year’s drop comes after a slowdown and appears, at a glance, to follow the overall curve). While a couple of years don’t make a trend, given how fast our emission was rising before, it’s notable. And given why it happened it’s possible it’s a trend that may continue.

The key player in this is China. They lowered their coal use, and increased their reliance on renewables substantially. This dropped their emission CO2 by 4 percent, and it may actually indicate a trend:

Because 58% of the increase in China’s primary energy consumption from 2013 to 2014 came from non-fossil- fuel sources (hydro, nuclear and other renewables), compared with 24% for increased natural gas and 17% for oil, China’s stabilization of, and even reduction in, coal use might be sustainable longer term.

In the case of China, their economy didn’t grow much during this time, which had something to do with this. But that’s not the case for the rest of the planet, where increased use of renewables didn’t appear to hurt the economy at all.

Incredibly, across the world, wind hit 370 gigawatts of power generation in 2014, compared to roughly 50 GW in 2004 (note: the increase in wind power generated in 2014 alone was over 50 GW). Solar is seeing even more dramatic gains: It went from 3.7 GW in 2004 to 178 GW in 2014. In 2014 alone it went up by 40 GW.

This is due to price installation incentives and a couple of breakthroughs in technology that allowed the price of manufacturing both wind and solar power systems to drop. In many places, they’re on parity with coal power on a dollar per kilowatt basis.

And this all happened as the global economy strengthened. As the researchers put it: 

What makes the 2014 and 2015 data so unusual is the pairing of relatively stable CO2 emissions with continued global economic expansion.

This is great news, but have a care here. Hitting a peak isn’t good, just better. Think of it this way: You feel sick, and take your temperature. Over the course of a day it keeps going up, hitting a peak of, say, 103°. If it drops to 102.5 that doesn’t mean you can go out and play racquetball; it just means you’re on the mend. You can breathe a sigh of relief once it’s back down to normal.

We’re nowhere near normal, at least not as measured by average CO2 emissions, CO2levels, and temperatures over the past few decades. As long as we produce any CO2, the level in the atmosphere will go up — CO2 is a long-lived molecule compared to other greenhouse gases — and temperatures will go with it. The goal is to become CO2 neutral, so that we no longer put any of it in the air, and the levels can stabilize, or even drop.

image

As it stands, we’re still dumping it into the air faster than any time not just in recorded history, but going back hundreds of thousands of years. It’s not just the amount that’s hurting us, it’s how fast it’s going up. We live in a delicately balanced system, and this huge rate of increase is throwing it grossly out of whack. The Earth’s atmosphere and biosphere are being kicked, hard, and don’t have time to react properly. This is why global warming is so dangerous: It’s changing our climate more rapidly than the Earth — and the life on it — can compensate. At the same time, we rely critically on the environment to feed seven billion of us… and that number is going up all the time as well. Droughts in one place, torrential rains in another, rising sea levels, and extreme weather all around are like setting off an explosive in a China shop.

So again, this slowdown in emission is good news.

It also puts the lie to the standard doom and gloom Republican claim that moving away from coal and using more renewables will hurt our economy. I’ve always thought that investing in new technologies was an excellent way to help the economy — it spurs innovation and creates new jobs. That’s what we’re seeing here with investing in wind and solar, with the added benefit of reducing global warming.

So are we nearing peak CO2 emission? Maybe. A few years isn’t necessarily a trend, of course. As the researchers say in their report, 

Time will tell whether this surprising interruption in emissions growth is transitory or a first step towards emissions stabilization.

A lot of this depends on China, and also India, which has well over a billion people, with hundreds of millions off the electric grid. They need to increase their renewable use as well as install a robust power grid to deliver it. But I like what I see here: Switching to renewables, if done correctly, helps everybody. We don’t need to increase dirty energy generation at all. It’s time to turn away from it even more.

* The numbers quoted in the new study differ a bit from the 40 billion I’ve been using for a few months, which is from a paper published in 2013. This is because the new report looks at fossil fuel burning and cement manufacturing, the two largest sources of CO2. It doesn’t include biomass burning, deforestation, and other smaller sources, which together add an extra 3 GT/year. It looks like the total number including all factors is about 39 GT/year currently, but — hopefully — dropping. My thanks to the Orbiting Carbon Observatory Science Team Leader David Crisp for straightening that out to me.

Source: @badastronomy via @slateinbrief

Read more of Slate’s coverage of the Paris climate talks.

image

#COP21 #TimeToChoose #TodayNotTomorrow #ActOnClimate

(via sagansense)


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk